AN UNBIASED VIEW OF RESPONSIBILITY OF FINDER OF GOODS CASE LAWS

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

An Unbiased View of responsibility of finder of goods case laws

Blog Article

33 . Const. P. 114/2025 (S.B.) Mst. Zoya and another V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally, the main objectives on the police will be to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the Courts, also to prevent the commission of crime, and earlier mentioned all, ensure legislation and order to protect citizens' lives and property. The regulation enjoins the police to become scrupulously fair for the offender and the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Deviations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other Courts, Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it.

A reduced court may well not rule against a binding precedent, even though it feels that it's unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. When the court believes that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the legislation evolve, it might both hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for your judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.

If your DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and commence according to the law. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, along with the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release like a legally acknowledged conviction. Read more

2299 of 2025. The findings are pending finalization and will be submitted without delay. Additionally they stated that directives for strict compliance have been issued to all Karachi models, with non-compliance experiencing departmental action. Furthermore, they submitted that an existing enquiry is underway. Therefore, they are directed to complete the proceedings and submit the enquiry report to this court through MIT-II of this Court. 12. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more

one hundred forty five . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued for the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and within the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court could be the highest court from the United States. Lessen courts around the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, plus the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its personal judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every state is often referred to because the “supreme” court, Even though there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the Big apple Court of Appeals or perhaps the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, While state courts may also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

In federal or multi-jurisdictional legislation systems there may perhaps exist conflicts between the different lower appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it may be necessary to distinguish how the law click here is applied in a single district, province, division or appellate department.

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a very well-founded proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, with the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..

twelve . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender plus the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.

A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case regulation refers to two cases heard within the state court, at the same level.

8. For that reasons stated earlier mentioned, this court finds the petition to generally be without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend from the comments, and their request is As a result acceded to. All pending applications, if any, also are dismissed. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable which is dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may perhaps look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page